Prev: Re: [SG] More questions from the weekend Next: Re: [SG] Discussion about weekend questions - Vehicle HW's

RE: [FT] Missile magazines

From: "B Lin" <lin@r...>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:28:29 -0600
Subject: RE: [FT] Missile magazines

I don't think it requires that much more effort since often fighter
hangars will be empty and you'll know if you have missiles in the mag
since you'll still have symbols left in the magazine.  You only have to
add the extra roll to components that still contain something.

--Binhan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Burton West [mailto:roger@firedrake.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 2:22 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [FT] Missile magazines
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 02:18:20PM -0600, B Lin wrote:
> >Perhaps such items as hangars and magazines should be 
> subjected to TWO threshold check rolls, one for the component 
> and one for the contents.
> 
> It's a special case, though; and one of the virtues of FT, as 
> far as I'm
> concerned, is that it minimises the number of special cases 
> you have to
> remember.
> 
> Roger


Prev: Re: [SG] More questions from the weekend Next: Re: [SG] Discussion about weekend questions - Vehicle HW's