Re: [SG] more ww2

John Sowerby wrote:

> 
>>
>> I don't like the selection of the 9mmNATO round as a "manstopper".
>> Actually, any FMJ or ball round that goes at supersonic speeds seems
>> like a bad idea to me.  Anything going that fast that isn't designed
to
>> "mushroom" or otherwise tranfer energy to the wound instead of carry
it
>> out the other side of the target is a bad choice IMO.  I'm presuming
>> that's what was fired in the UZI's carried boy our SecretService,
right?
> 

9mm Nato, and as far as I know all pistol ammo save for FN 5,7mm (same 
as int the P90) are subsonic.