Prev: Re: [Campaign] Criteria Next: Re: Re: Mission Creep - Was Re: The new US Army APC the Stinger

Re: Re: Mission Creep - Was Re: The new US Army APC the Stinger

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:03:06 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Re: Mission Creep - Was Re: The new US Army APC the Stinger



On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Laserlight wrote:

> > > Or 1d6, a 6 is "5 + reroll".  "This frigate that was
> > > budgeted at 65Mcr, uh, well, cost overruns, um,
> > > looks more like 111MCr....at the moment.	We're
> > > still a year behind schedule, though."
>
> John replied:
> > "Very interesting.	We've awarded the revised contract
> > to your competitors who submitted the second-best bid.
> >  You are under arrest on suspicion of high treason
>
> The AE approach is more along the lines of financial penalties for
> over budget and over schedule.  This means that bids tend to be padded
> a bit, as insurance, but it also means that we get predictable
> numbers.

*cough*

Somewhat predictable?

*cough*

Prev: Re: [Campaign] Criteria Next: Re: Re: Mission Creep - Was Re: The new US Army APC the Stinger