Ye olde Tracks Versus Wheels
From: "Thomas Barclay" <kaladorn@m...>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 12:43:10 -0400
Subject: Ye olde Tracks Versus Wheels
1. Is this really the place for this?
2. I read a comparison of various mods of the
M113 chassis (including fire support versions)
which compared these two, and the winner
seemed to be (in the authors opinion) the
M113. I think this largly stemmed from the size
of a C-130 and the ability of an up-armoured
M113 with applicque armour to fit, whereas the
LAV with applicque armour and a full combat
load of fuel and goodies couldn't. Other issues
were better mobility across the broad range of
terrain for tracked vehicles, the ability of the
M113 based fire support variant to come with a
full combat load of rounds and still meet C-130
weight limits (unlike the 5 rounds the equivalent
LAV could carry and the reduced fuel load), etc.
As I recall the summary (which could be flawed,
and if so the flawed recollection is mine,
probably not the authors):
M113: more air portable ( a key issue ),
better performance in some key terrain types,
lower ground pressure, simpler
transmission/gearbox, better as a mobile gun
platform, better armour and ammo loadouts
while still meeting the air portability goals,
and perhaps a lower silhouette, cheaper
because it would involve refurbishing older
equipment rather than buying all-new
equipment with new expense (and all that goes
with new equipment)
LAV: Better self deployability (a not insignificant
asset), and probably better characteristics
versus various types of landmines,
I got the impression that the end summary was:
For peacekeeping and the like, send the LAVs,
because they do well on roads, can self deploy
easily, and are maybe better against mines, and
in this situation, the applicque armour and the
fuel and ammo can be installed/loaded after
they come off the plane - the need for them to
immediately be combat capable is far lesser.
For situations where you want to insert and
have a faster touchdown-ready to fight time,
and where you want to get the vehicle in-
theater in a roll off ready state, and where you
want to have a less complicated drive system
than the 8x8 system, or where you think better
performance in bad terrain is required (the
Russians learned in afghanistan that in some
places, wheeled vehicles just can't quite match
tracked for mobility), the M113 refitted might
be a better choice.
I'm sure there are counter arguments, but this
was one presentation and it did seem to
present the pros and cons.
Tomb
---------------------------------------------
Thomas Barclay
Co-Creator of http://www.stargrunt.ca
Stargrunt II and Dirtside II game site
No Battle Plan Survives Contact With Dice.
-- Mark 'Indy' Kochte