Prev: Re: [OT] Battlecruisers vs. battleships Next: ESU Desantniki

Re: Re: [FT] Battlecruisers vs. battleships

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 18:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Re: [FT] Battlecruisers vs. battleships


--- Laserlight <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Eric Foley stiltman@teleport.com
> > Strictly speaking, not really.  I wouldn't define
> the tactics
> involved as
> > toe-to-toe so much as hit-and-run.
> 
> You were, IIRC, the one saying that high thrust
> wastes space that
> would be better invested in weapons?
> 
Perhaps viewing the 'Privateer vs NI' game would
help with the 'speed bad, weapons good' discussion?
(Another 'faster than average' vs average thrust
squadron game, trying out offset firing arcs vs
vanilla ships.)

Bye for now,
John L.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience


Prev: Re: [OT] Battlecruisers vs. battleships Next: ESU Desantniki