Re: Re: [FT] Battlecruisers vs. battleships
From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@q...>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 20:24:25 -0400
Subject: Re: Re: [FT] Battlecruisers vs. battleships
>
> > From: Eric Foley stiltman@teleport.com
> > >it's kind of silly to build a ship of the wall sized vessel that
doesn't
> dare fight something its own size.
>
> > <grin> Oh, I want my BCs to fight things their own
size--merchants,
> > troop ships, fleet tenders....
>
> Yes, but I think that's just a _slight_ misstatement of what I was
saying,
> no? ;)
<grin> No. But what you said wasn't what you meant, and I knew what
you meant. I need to start marking <dry humor>, apparently.
> > Er, Eric, it [l]ooks to me as if you're saying a Thrust 6 ship can
go
> toe-to-toe with a Thrust 2 ship?
>
> Strictly speaking, not really. I wouldn't define the tactics
involved as
> toe-to-toe so much as hit-and-run.
You were, IIRC, the one saying that high thrust wastes space that
would be better invested in weapons?