Prev: Re: fighters (shorter than the last rant) Next: RE: Fighters options please

Re: [FT] back to fighters

From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 16:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [FT] back to fighters

On Sun, 12 May 2002, John Atkinson wrote:

> 
> --- "Imre A. Szabo" <ias@sprintmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > space IMMEDIATELY AROUND the target ship actually
> > ISN'T all that big
> > > anymore, and is going to get awfully crowded with
> > lots of fighters zipping
> > > past each other, especially if they're arriving
> > from different
> > directions!!
> > 
> > Oh really???  This depends on how big an MU is and
> > how much time one turn
> > is.  The accepted, but un-official, scale is 1 MU =
> > 10,000 km's and 1 turn =
> > 10 minutes. 
> 
> You know, it comes across as fairly immature and
> irrational to start lecturing the author of a game
> system on his work.  
> 
> Especially when you do so rudely.

You know you've been *really* rude when... Mr. John Atkinson actually
has
to tell you off.

I needed a good laugh. Thanks, everyone!

Brian - yh728@victoria.tc.ca -
- http://wind.prohosting.com/~warbard/games.html -

> 
> John
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> http://launch.yahoo.com


Prev: Re: fighters (shorter than the last rant) Next: RE: Fighters options please