Prev: [FT] fighter flavor (LONG) was: interceptors Next: Gonkishness

Re: fighters (shorter than the last rant)

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:15:59 -0700
Subject: Re: fighters (shorter than the last rant)

>From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com>

>Traditionally Interceptors have been either big and fast with lots of 
>stores or somewhere below that. Their primary tactic wasn't to dogfight
per 
>say, rather to make slashing tactics on the target at high speed.

I think maybe we should get away from calling them Interceptors, since
that 
conjures up images of modern interceptors.  The Interceptors in FT
actually 
feel more like superiority fighters.  See the post I just sent out.

3B^2

_________________________________________________________________


Prev: [FT] fighter flavor (LONG) was: interceptors Next: Gonkishness