RE: RE: Re: Fighters

At 11:51 AM -0400 5/6/02, laserlight@quixnet.net wrote:
>Let's rephrase the question as:
>"Some people want more of a early 1900's feel instead of a WW2 or 
>modern feel to fleet actions.	What Optional rules would you suggest 
>to tone down fighters in those settings" etc

Then you reduce the speed of fighters to a lower value and reduce 
their endurance as well as anti-ship ability. Torpedo's should stay 
the same. PDS effectiveness would get a corresponding down rate as 
well though.

At the same time, I personally think that core systems ought to be 
used and that torpedo's have penetrating damage similar to the 
Kra'vak weapons.
-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@turner.com			 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-    Smart ID cards in the US, Smart ID cards in Hong Kong,    -
-		      what is the difference?		       - 
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -