Prev: Fighters [FT] and Decoys [DS] Next: RE: (OT)(SG2) A question, to ARV or not to ARV...

Re: Another tack on fighters

From: Donald Hosford <Hosford.Donald@a...>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 02:25:38 -0400
Subject: Re: Another tack on fighters

I suppose that this means: "that you can never tell what a deturmined
player
will do..."

However, if a player consistantly brings in fighter heavy formations,
you
could do something seriously anti-fighter enough times to convince him
to
change his tactics...

Donald Hosford

Kevin Walker wrote:

> On Sunday, May 5, 2002, at 12:41 AM, Donald Hosford wrote:
>
> > So what it seems to total up to:
> >
> > FB vs FB -- Seems to be ok.
>
> Even in FB vs. FB (or a number of other design situations) it's more
the
> number of fighters that decides whether they're not balanced.  OMMV,
but
> what I've witnessed is when the number of fighters differs greatly
from
> the number of PDs.  If larger point values this becomes even more
> problematic as the fighters can dogpile on one of few targets and
> sometimes succeed in avoiding some of the PDs in the fleet because
they
> don't have ADFC tied with some or they are out of range of use.  Thus
> specifically with FB designs if one side brings all carriers and the
> other side may be in for a stiff battle.
>
> Kevin Walker


Prev: Fighters [FT] and Decoys [DS] Next: RE: (OT)(SG2) A question, to ARV or not to ARV...