Prev: Re: Another tack on fighters | Next: RE: Re: Another tack on fighters |
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:52:38AM -0400, Indy wrote:
>If I may make one little point (not having my books here with me ;-),
>I believe J Tuffley did state that the FB1 designs were NOT optimal.
Page 2, "Designer's Notes", second para. Emphasis is on the fact that
these ships are expected to perform well against multiple types of
opponent.
Prev: Re: Another tack on fighters | Next: RE: Re: Another tack on fighters |