Prev: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:40:24 -0700
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

>From: Flak Magnet <flakmagnet@tabletop-battlezone.com>

>   Bow and Aft arcs (aft actually being a non-firing arc, really) could
>have a lower number of possible attacking fighter, not so much due to
an
>assumption that ships will generally be linear in shape, but because
the
>forward motion of the ship along the fore-aft axis would limit the
>effective attack vectors.  If it wouldn't make it "too complicated",
the
>bow should have even fewer than the stern, because of the assumption
>that fighters can't fire through an aft arc just like the big ships,
and
>to maneuver to keep getting a good head-on attack vector you have to
>turn away from the target sometime...

Whoops, just realized one problem with that line of reasoning:	In
vector, 
the axis of the bow and aft arcs is not necessarily parallel or equal to
the 
line of movement.....

3B^2

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 


Prev: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity