RE: Andromeda

In message <a35af22e4b.Charles@nerik.monkslode.fsnet.co.uk>
	  Charles Taylor <nerik@monkslode.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

> In message <2E66F35C37F692459A7BCEC6CC9782B81F239C@exchange.kuju.com>
>	    "Tony Francis" <tony.francis@kuju.com> wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > Some of you who track FT scales (or notional ones), how big would 
> > > 
> > > Length: 1301 m
> > > Beam: 976 m
> > > Height: 325 m
> > 
> > At 1/2400th, this comes out at a whopping 54cm long and 40cm wide
(ie five and a half tiems as long as an NAC SDN). I'm not even going to
think about the mass this represents ....
> > 
> > Tony
> >
> Well, going by the tonnage listed on the website (96.4 kTonnes), she's
> _only_ 964 MASS :-)
> 
> I think the tonnages listed may be a bit low :-)
> 
> Charles 
>
What I forgot to add - the 1sr episode dialog gives an approximate
volume for Andromeda of 20 million cubic m (actual hull volume) - with
that 96.4 kTonne, thats 5kg per cubic m - or 1/200 of the density of
water!

Charles