RE: [SG] HAMR
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Subject: RE: [SG] HAMR
--- The Sutherlands <nma@kda.attmil.ne.jp> wrote:
^^^^^
What's that extension mean?
> How much signature would a cone rifle have? I would
> think it would have
> enough punch for anti-material work. And since we
> are talking about future
> weapons we can assume they have worked out all the
> bugs by then.
I don't think they'd have much signature at first, but
the rocket motor would have a good sonic/thermal
signature. Depends on what your enemy's
counter-sniper doctrine is and what kind of sensors
are available.
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage