Prev: Re: Re: [SG-WW2] BAR Next: Re: Re: IJN/UNSC technology

Re: [SG-WW2] BAR

From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 07:31:34 -0800
Subject: Re: [SG-WW2] BAR

>From: bbrush@unlnotes.unl.edu

>The BAR (Browning Automatic Rifle) was as you thought, the squad
support
>weapon for US infantry squads.  It was a great weapon for it's time,
but it
>had it's drawbacks.  Probably it's biggest weakness was that it had a
>fairly high rate of fire, but it was magazine fed, not belt fed.  This
>meant a lot of reloading.  It was also damn heavy, weighing in at
around 18
>pounds.
>
>Also as you mentioned it basically fits the bill as an assault rifle
and
>this is how John Browning first envisioned it being used.  The army had
>other ideas though.

IIRC, didn't it fire the .30-06 round?	I love that round - it was
designed 
for military use, but makes a damned good derr hunting round.

2B^2

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Prev: Re: Re: [SG-WW2] BAR Next: Re: Re: IJN/UNSC technology