Re: [FT/MT/DS]: Mass vs Capacity

Oerjan Ohlson wrote:

>Yes, you are. Any evidence to the contrary is either a typo or an
illusion 
>:-)

Damned illusory typeface....

>Thing is, Mike Elliott (who wrote the FT/DS interface rules in More
Thrust,
>and was more involved in the Fleet Books than I was) says that fighters
are
>smaller than 1 Mass. Last time I saw Jon T. express an opinion on the
>subject, he agreed with Mike (I'm afraid I don't have an on-line
reference
>for this, though). But if you want to bash your head bloody trying to
>resolve a rules inconsistency which the author of half of the
inconsistent
>rule basically has told you to ignore, you're quite welcome to it

If you think I should ignore it, I'll take that into consideration.  My 
objection was to your saying I had read more than was stated, since that
IS 
what was stated.  If you want to say that what I read is errata, that's
a 
different matter altogether.

2B^2

_________________________________________________________________