RE: Re: GPS + Pulsars + an apology/rebuttal
From: "laserlight@q..." <laserlight@quixnet.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:33:43 -0500
Subject: RE: Re: GPS + Pulsars + an apology/rebuttal
Roger Books
> > Who is going to put in beacons that will only be good
> > after the signal gets across some large number of
> > (light) years?
Katy:
> Erm. Us?
>
> We have sent out messages that are unlikely to be read inside the next
> 50,000 years. Sometimes people can be long-term about things...
Roger:
>That was a short term relatively inexpensive publicity stunt. The
costs to put out something that will have enough power to be a
"space GPS" in normal space requires a huge investment that will
come into affect after the builders and politicians have retired.
Might want to change that to "may require" and "might not come into
effect"--kind of hard to be sure whether it'll be economical in 150+
years.
If we put in a beacon at a number of stars, they'll be usable after
just a few years--how many years depends on how many stars, of course.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at