Prev: SG2->WW2, bugs, glossaries, etc. Next: Re: SG2->WW2, bugs, glossaries, etc.

SV: other periods

From: "Claus Paludan" <cpaludan@w...>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:16:34 +0100
Subject: SV: other periods

I think that we will start with the as-is as well (then again, since I
am
writing the whole thing in danish a new rule or two might pop in- hehe).

My first priority will be to create a TO&E with weight on the squad and
platoon. After that it will be the weapons and vehicles allthough that
shouldn't be too much of a problem.

---
With kind regards

Claus Paludan

W-site [privat] : http://www.krigsspil.dk

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]På vegne af Tony Francis
Sendt: 21. februar 2002 17:38
Til: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Emne: Re: other periods

I've played SG2-WW2 before with infantry only (we were getting to grips
with the rules so didn't want to try vehicles !). We used the rules
'as-is' with no mods or house rules. The only things you have to decide
are are the ratings of weapons. IIRC we made bolt action rifles for each
nation have FP1 / impact D10 (as per the hunting rifle in the basic
weapons table). SMGs are in the rules as FP3 / impact D8. Since we were
playing 1940 British / French vs Germans we wanted to differentiate
between the LMGs in use. I think we gave the magazine fed British Bren
and the French LMG (Chatellerault ?) a D8 support die, and the belt fed
German MG39 a D10.

Jim Hopper wrote:
>
> I would also be interested in hearing about SG2 conversions to WW2 and
Cold
> War (Modern) battles.  These are rules conversions that I plan on
> undertaking myself in the future and would benefit greatly from others
> experiences.
>
> Thanks
> Jim Hopper

--
-----------------------------
Tony Francis
Senior Software Engineer


Prev: SG2->WW2, bugs, glossaries, etc. Next: Re: SG2->WW2, bugs, glossaries, etc.