Re: [OT] oddball enrivonment questions
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 07:55:04 +0100
Subject: Re: [OT] oddball enrivonment questions
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Bell" <bbell1@insight.rr.com>
> Frag should be effective over a larger area than in an atmosphere,
normal
> gravity. Cuncussion would be much less effective (no pressure wave,
but
> still subject to any shrapnel).
> 2) Effects of low-G, no-atmosphere on:
> Tac Missile Launcher (GMS/P)
> - It would either have to be built with vectored jets (much more
expensive)
> or be unguided. It would also have a lot of kickback to the person
firing
it
> (backwash from the missile engine).
Your idea about backwash is in contradiction to your idea for concussion
from grenades. I sugesst both should be reduced.
Greetings