Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 08:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
--- Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com> wrote:
> As opposed to a spotter keying in a code and lasing
> a target.
Yeah. If that's all you're doing, it's not hard.
Remember there's a whole damn MOS revolving around
that.
Or a
> mortarman adjusting fire in the correct direction in
> a battle?
Mortarmen are rarely under fire--and frat happens more
often than they would like to admit.
Or a > grenadier giving the correct windage?
Not as easy as it sounds even under non-combat
conditions.
Or a LT > reading his GPS unit,
> correctly identifying a target and
LTs can barely find their way around garission, much
less the field. Never mind calling for fire.
> Yep full sized M-16's. That fits real nice in the
> fighting
> compartment of that M-1 Abrams. Right in there next
> to the driver.
> And the Gunner doesn't have a problem at all of
> getting to his M-16
> when getting out does he?
They issue them so they must fit. I think Don can
speak to how many weapons get carried around inside a
Paladin.
> But you're right. FN doesn't know anything about
> predicting the
> prevailing winds of armament technology.
So what, if FN makes it it must rock?
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!