Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
From: DAWGFACE47@w...
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 22:20:40 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
any military force, confronted with such a situation, that is unable to
retreat, would be justifiiable in using lethat force to protect the
lives of the soldiers under attack.
any police force, with officers under attack in such a situation and
with no retreat possible would also be legal using lethal force.
your right to survival supercedes their right to survival if they are
attacking you or threatening your life.
and they most assuredly would be.
i would rather put my fate into the hand of a military court for
shooting in defense of self and mates, then let these idiots get close
enough to hurt me/mine.
ditto for a jury trial.
combat is not a normal environment, and sometimes actions are required
that might cause night horrors for years afterwards.
war is horrible, abnormal.
there is no good war, but there is bad war. what you describe is bad
war.
also, even with the use of non-lethals, this situation would result in
the deaths and injuries to many in the first and second ranks due to
trampling, suffacation, drowning, being shot by accident by mates
weapons, blown up by armed, dropped hand grenades, etc.
and then there would the killed /wounded inflicted on the first 2
groups by the armed, attackers who fight inspite of threats to their
own forces.
this scenario is the wet dream of the anti-miliary folks, rabid
paficists, politicians with their own caring aggendas, and CNN.
my thoughts. i am sure that others ave their own thoughts as well
as an after thought, i suggest those hopped up gunmen and any other
idiots that rush attack task force ranger in somalia probably cause
the deaths of thousands of bystanders as well as combatants.
this is the closest i know of to your scenario.
maybe the anticipated fanatical japanese defense of the home islands
by both military and civilians.