Prev: Re: Re:1900's was: COLONIAL WEAPONS | Next: Re: colony size was 1900's |
Neil wrote:
>
> > >Laserlight said:
> > >Beth, how about just let Tom (or someone else with a similarly
warped
> > >sense of humor--ie not quite as warped as mine) pick for you? ;-)
> > >
> > >[Tomb]
> > >You know, I know Derek is of Queenslander stock, so the thing that
would
> > >be nearest and dearest to his heart is.... <drum roll>..... (after
Beth
> > >and the kids of course)..... SHEEP!
> > >
> > >Of course, to make it sci-fi, it'd have to be armour plated,
> > >cyber-enhanced, combat sheep. Bah-a-a-a-a-ad News!
>
> (Must not give in to temptation.... to late, will failing here goes)
>
> They are of course not referred to as combat sheep they are Warsheeps
the
> larger ones being called Battlesheeps (occasionally Bah-a-tlesheeps)
and
> Cr-ewe-sers , the older ones called sheeps of the line and the smaller
ones
> are ewe-scorts
>
> Ducking and rolling after causing bed-lamb
> Neil
Oddly enough, we're working on a range of Welsh models ... under the
title of SpaceSheeps. The designer (not me for once) is in fact part
Welsh himself, so he can get away with it ...
Tony
-----------------------------
Tony Francis
Senior Software Engineer
Prev: Re: Re:1900's was: COLONIAL WEAPONS | Next: Re: colony size was 1900's |