Re: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale
From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 21:17:57 -0800
Subject: Re: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale
I don't doubt the RECIPIENTS would accept the honors. But the people of
say, Dallas, might object to the honor being called the "Count of
Dallas."
American culture has historically been anti-monarchist.
Brian B2
"The Irish are the only race of people on Earth for which psychoanalysis
is
of no use."
- S. Freud
>From: WJAL21@aol.com
>Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
>Subject: Re: Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale
>Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 19:41:36 EST
>
>In a message dated 02/12/01 21:32:37 GMT Standard Time,
>bbilderback@hotmail.com writes:
>
>
> > Sorry, I should have said, "Nobility", not "nobility" - I was
referring
>to
> > the possession of titles/peerage, NOT the personal quality (The two
>seeming
> > to have no direct connection).
> >
> >
>
>Most Nobility currently are "Life Peers". The title is not passed on to
>descendants.
>Also they are generally awarded to People making an outstanding
>contribution
>to the country. Senior military officers, Chief Constables, civil
servants,
>retired politicians, and very successful businessmen. Of course there
also
>those who get an award for sucking up to the right person, i.e. the
Prime
>Minister.
>They are really a pat on the back for a job well done.
>As for Americans accepting them I don't think there is much doubt they
>would.
>t's not as if they are any more modest about their achievements than
the
>English. There are a couple of Americans given a title every now and
again,
>I
>think normally a Knighthood. General Stormin Norman (sorry can't spell
his
>surname) got one after the Gulf war.
>Just my opinion
>
>John Law
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp