Prev: Point systems in general, was RE: grav Next: Re: Walkers, was RE: grav

Walkers, was RE: grav

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:07:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Walkers, was RE: grav


--- Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@hotmail.com> wrote:
> My question was rhetorical - the point being that
> for the game to be fair 
> and balanced,  a walker, while having a different
> set of abilities and 
> limitations different from those of a Grav tank or a
> tracked tank, should be 
> just as effective a unit in the game as any other
> vehicle costing the same 
> amount of points.

I think Mr. Tuffley made it quite clear in his rules
that oversized (ie >1) walkers are not part of the
background or really even the core rules.  They are in
there for battletech idiots who love Giant Robots[tm].
 They were never intended to be balanced against tanks
because Giant Robots are a lousy military idea.

John

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals


Prev: Point systems in general, was RE: grav Next: Re: Walkers, was RE: grav