Re: [LST] Re: [SG] Firing & actions
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [LST] Re: [SG] Firing & actions
--- devans@uneb.edu wrote:
>
> Yves said:
> ***
> I hope it's not the real intent of the rule or else
> all my troopers will
> need 2 riffles or more! (just kidding)
> ***
>
> John said:
> ***
> You give soldiers multiple weapons to increase
> versatility, not firepower. ie., a soldier with a
> rifle and a buzzbomb is capable of engaging tanks OR
> infantry. Not both at the same time. Shades of
> freakin' Rambo, running around with an M-60 in each
> hand.
> ***
>
> Looks to me as if that's already been covered, John.
> Or, where does this
> fall in the 75/25% spectrum?
>
> The_Beast
>
Maybe I'm unusually dense, or those beers are kicking
my butt or something, but I have no idea what you're
talking about.
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals