RE: Powers That Be
From: "Donogh McCarthy" <donoghmc@h...>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 09:12:01 +0000
Subject: RE: Powers That Be
I agree with the American/Scottish remarks, it is getting repetitive.
But I'd just say that if that's what people want to do with the
Tuffleyverse then off they go.
>Why won't anyone do something original? Seperatist >Basques, or
Militant Expansionist Swedes (The Restored >Vasa Hegemony?), or Kurds,
or Sihks, or Carmelite >Nuns, or breakaway Thais, or libertarian
monarchist >wackos (Oh, I think that may be taken), or a restored
>Bavarian Monarchy, or Seperatist Austrians, or >Romanians, or
crossdressing Nazi Eskimos, or Costa >Ricans tired of the Banana
Republic atmosphere of the >LLAR, or SOMETHING. . .
>
Well I for one have the Confederation of Scandanavian Kingdoms
(including Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Iceland), which shares a
defensive alliance but nothing elseĀ (it is a confederation after all)
I just noticed that none of the countries are mentioned in the
Tuffleyverse (as far as I noticed) and that it gave me an excuse to set
conflicts with the ESU, and I could get away with conflicts with any of
the major powers.
If I ever get my website up and running you'll see their designs for
FT/DS and even a bit of recent history
Donogh
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com