Prev: RE: Scenarious Next: Re: [OT] Hope

Re: Scenarious

From: "Bob DeAngelis" <chubbybob@t...>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:06:35 +0200
Subject: Re: Scenarious

   First let me say that I make no apology for my  outburst. I would
however
like to clarify my reasons. I was an avid player of modern arms and
armour.
However the Falklands war and the death of friends and aquaintances left
a
dirty taste in the mouth. I no longer play anything less than 200 years
old
and mainly game sci fi. It is "easier" . I can in no way contemplate
scenarios built around an incident that happend just a few hours ago and
may
involve the deaths of thousands of innocent  Americans. The coldness of
this
approach is the sort of thinking that made people think they could fight
and
win a nuclear war in the 60's and 70's.
I wish to distance myself from it as far as possible. If this gets me
thrown
off the list so be it. First comment still stands..

	  Bob DeAngelis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob DeAngelis" <chubbybob@terra.es>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: Scenarious

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Books" <books@mail.state.fl.us>
> To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:53 PM
> Subject: Scenarious
>
>
> > Well, the attack on the World Trade Center (both
> > buildings have now collapsed) is certainly to lead
> > to some scenarious for SG.
>
> Christ almighty .. Are you totally fucking insensitive or a class one
> fucking jerkoff
>
>	  Bob (gobsmacked) DeAngelis
>


Prev: RE: Scenarious Next: Re: [OT] Hope