Prev: Re: FT-Ship construction (was RE:Campaigns) Next: Irregular and Scotia minis, was Re: My alter ego: [6mm-Miniatures]

Re: FT-Ship construction (was RE:Campaigns)

From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:18:29 +0100
Subject: Re: FT-Ship construction (was RE:Campaigns)

In message <002101c12e6d$83f578a0$a2071f3f@pavilion>
	  "Laserlight" <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote:

> Basing it on mass means big freighters take a long time even though
> there's a lot of empty space, sure you don't want to use NPV?
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Hal <hal@buffnet.net>
> To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 1:09 PM
> Subject: Re: FT-Ship construction (was RE:Campaigns)
> 
> 
> > At the present moment, I'm looking at the concept that build times
> based on
> > mass is equal to 1.5 weeks per mass unit...
> >
> >
>
How about using 'used' mass, i.e. don't count MASS used for cargo
(MASS used for passengers, troops, science labs, etc. should be counted,
but perhaps with a discount)?

Also, perhaps a discount for 'civilian hull' to represent the smaller
crew facilities?

Charles

Prev: Re: FT-Ship construction (was RE:Campaigns) Next: Irregular and Scotia minis, was Re: My alter ego: [6mm-Miniatures]