Prev: Re: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required) Next: RE: figure poses and MICVs

RE: figure poses and MICVs

From: Binhan Lin <Lin@R...>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:08:23 -0600
Subject: RE: figure poses and MICVs



-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan M Gill [mailto:rmgill@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:54 AM
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: figure poses and MICVs

 <SNIP>
Of course in the day of electronic sensors he could be looking the 
high tech way, but then the CDMs could look for that sensor too and 
attack him. Wow...how do you find a minefield when its protected by 
CDMs that want to blow you do shreds when you get close enough to see 
it...?

<SNIP>

I would think the same way modern tactics are used for ARM's - You put
up
decoy emissions to draw out the active missiles or use mobile sites
intermittently to keep the missile guessing if they are in loiter mode. 
I
would suspect that in the future, for mines, you would have the
electronic
equivalent to a bangalore - just some massive emp pulse that would
either
trigger a mine or burn it out and make it insensitive.	Although the
poor
guy setting it off would probably feel naked since he couldn't carry any
electronics, not even a radio (perhaps there is a market for vacuum
tubes...)for fear of frying them when he set off the EMP charge.

--Binhan


Prev: Re: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required) Next: RE: figure poses and MICVs