Prev: RE: FT-Number crunching required (HELP) Next: Re: New FAQ, was...

Re: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required)

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@p...>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:35:50 -0700
Subject: Re: [FT] Fighter Balance (was: FT-Number crunching required)

>How would you read the situation? How many fighter groups are too weak
to be
>of value. How many are too many as to be overpowering if the other side
does
>not have any?

Actually, I've found as little as 1 or 2 fighter groups to be of 
immense value if either deployed defensively against other fighters, 
used as SML defense, or held until a target has been stripped of 
defenses.

Schoon


Prev: RE: FT-Number crunching required (HELP) Next: Re: New FAQ, was...