Re: FT-Number crunching required (HELP)
From: "Bif Smith" <bif@b...>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 08:34:54 +0100
Subject: Re: FT-Number crunching required (HELP)
----- Original Message -----
From: Derek Fulton <derekfulton@bigpond.com>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: FT-Number crunching required (HELP)
> G'day
>
> Me stealing Derek's email here to correct myself!!
>
> I forgot to actually multiple my final results by the size of the
K-gun
(so
> did the if less then class double damage adjustment, but not the
actual
> class value stuff.... ugh!)
>
> The table for an MTM-K3 SHOULD look more like....
>
> #PDS: 1 SM 3 MTM 2 MTM 1 MTM
> 0 12.25 47.25 31.50 15.75
> 1 9.75 39.38 23.63 7.88
> 2 7.62 31.50 15.75 3.94
> 3 5.85 23.63 11.81 1.98
> 4 4.39 19.69 7.88 0.99
> 5 3.24 15.75 5.92 0.50
> 6 2.36 11.81 3.94 0.25
>
> And the K2 version....
>
> #PDS: 1 SM 3 MTM 2 MTM 1 MTM
> 0 12.25 28.00 18.67 9.33
> 1 9.75 23.33 14.00 4.67
> 2 7.62 18.67 9.33 2.33
> 3 5.85 14.00 7.00 1.17
> 4 4.39 11.67 4.67 0.59
> 5 3.24 9.33 3.51 0.29
> 6 2.36 7.00 2.33 0.15
>
> So in comparison to the normal MTMs with the table
> #PDS: 1 SM 3 MTM 2 MTM 1 MTM
> 0 12.25 21.00 14.00 7.00
> 1 9.75 17.50 10.50 3.50
> 2 7.62 14.00 7.00 1.75
> 3 5.85 10.50 5.25 0.88
> 4 4.39 8.75 3.50 0.44
> 5 3.24 7.00 2.63 0.22
> 6 2.36 5.25 1.75 0.11
>
> You get the Mk-3 version at 2.25x as expensive and the Mk-2 version at
> 1.33x as expensive. Thus the k-3 version costs would be best modelled
by
> something like Mass 3, Cost of massx4.5, which is a bit difficult
under
> current FB integer costing system - so k-2 version is probably simpler
to
> go with at mass 2, cost of massx4.
>
> OK hopefully I go closer this time!! Sheesh!
>
> Beth
>
> Derek Fulton
> 12 Balaka st.
> Rosny, Hobart.
> Tasmania, 7018.
> Australia
>
> Phone; (03) 62459123
> Mobile; 0438459123
> Email; derekfulton@bigpond.com
> URL; http://www.users.bigpond.com/derekfulton/
>
>
Thankyou, that is exactly what I was after. Judging from the dammage of
1 MT
vs 1 SML salvo, using the same mass as a SMR might be right, or a SML
launcher for a launched version (I think). Anyway, thanks again.
BIF
"Yorkshire born, yorkshire bred,
strong in arms, thick in head"
PS-TA