Re: FT-Number crunching required (HELP)

G'day

Me stealing Derek's email here to correct myself!!

I forgot to actually multiple my final results by the size of the K-gun
(so 
did the if less then class double damage adjustment, but not the actual 
class value stuff.... ugh!)

The table for an MTM-K3 SHOULD look more like....

#PDS: 1 SM    3 MTM    2 MTM	1 MTM
     0	   12.25     47.25     31.50	   15.75
     1	    9.75      39.38	23.63	    7.88
     2	    7.62      31.50	15.75	    3.94
     3	    5.85      23.63	 11.81	    1.98
     4	    4.39      19.69	 7.88	     0.99
     5	    3.24      15.75	 5.92	     0.50
     6	    2.36      11.81	 3.94	     0.25

And the K2 version....

#PDS: 1 SM    3 MTM    2 MTM	1 MTM
     0	   12.25     28.00     18.67	   9.33
     1	    9.75      23.33	14.00	    4.67
     2	    7.62      18.67	9.33	     2.33
     3	    5.85      14.00	7.00	     1.17
     4	    4.39      11.67	4.67	     0.59
     5	    3.24      9.33	 3.51	      0.29
     6	    2.36      7.00	 2.33	      0.15

So in comparison to the normal MTMs with the table
#PDS: 1 SM    3 MTM    2 MTM	1 MTM
     0	   12.25     21.00     14.00	   7.00
     1	    9.75      17.50	10.50	    3.50
     2	    7.62      14.00	 7.00	     1.75
     3	    5.85      10.50	 5.25	     0.88
     4	    4.39      8.75	 3.50	      0.44
     5	    3.24      7.00	 2.63	      0.22
     6	    2.36      5.25	 1.75	      0.11

You get the Mk-3 version at 2.25x as expensive and the Mk-2 version at 
1.33x as expensive. Thus the k-3 version costs would be best modelled by

something like Mass 3, Cost of massx4.5, which is a bit difficult under 
current FB integer costing system - so k-2 version is probably simpler
to 
go with at mass 2, cost of massx4.

OK hopefully I go closer this time!! Sheesh!

Beth

Derek Fulton
12 Balaka st.
Rosny, Hobart.
Tasmania,  7018.
Australia

Phone; (03) 62459123
Mobile; 0438459123
Email; derekfulton@bigpond.com
URL; http://www.users.bigpond.com/derekfulton/