Prev: Re: [FT]Sensors and Sensibility[LONG] Next: Re: AW: [FT]Star Trek rules - BIG thanks

Re: [FT]Sensors and Sensibility[LONG]

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:18:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT]Sensors and Sensibility[LONG]

At 10:55 AM -0700 6/26/01, David Griffin wrote:
>--- Bif Smith <bif@bifsmith.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>...
>>  The problem with using fighters would be the fact
>>  unless you are going to
>>  hold down the speed of your ships to less than 24
>>  MU, your ships are going
>>  to outrun your fighters...
>
>In threat areas my ships are seldom going 24mu.
>Not even in potential threat areas. Of course
>there are no rules to equip fighters with sensors
>though you might argue that they have basic
>sensors just in their normal state.

Don't confuse relative with absolute velocity. Two task forces moving 
at 50mu could in relation to each other have very low relative 
velocities....

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill		 ----------	      SW1025 H -
-   Internet Technologies  --  Data Center Manager (3N &10S)   -
- ryan.gill@turner.com			 rmgill@mindspring.com -
-		   www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- C&R-FFL -	  The gunshow loophole isn't		 - NRA -
-	     keep federal laws out of private lives	       -	 

Prev: Re: [FT]Sensors and Sensibility[LONG] Next: Re: AW: [FT]Star Trek rules - BIG thanks