Prev: [FT] PBEM Game - Sentient Strife Simulation Next: Re: Support the Origins Awards!

Re: [FT] Unpredictable AI

From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:17:17 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [FT] Unpredictable AI

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Alan and Carmel Brain wrote:

> That's why I like a Human controlling a bunch of specialised AIs. Far
better
> than either on their own.

Which was what I was thinking all along. especially since there's two
lines of argumentation used:

1. AI is able to respond with a much higher speed than humans

2. AI lacks the flexibility of a human pilot

So, why not combine the two, have a human pilot, assisted by massive
amounts of AI. If all works, then maybe he just rides the backseat. But
when drtermining whether a weapon should be fired on a suspect target
(but not 100%^ identified hostile), when dealing with unexpected
circumstances, etc etc, it's useful to have the human there.

Besides, is it truly politically acceptable NOT to have a human in the
loop of a weapon of (mass?) destruction? Do you think it will BECOME
acceptable?

Cheers,

   Derk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine

iD8DBQE7MfPlJXH58oo6ncURAqoQAJ9ZieZqdCxPzMQ1GFCWzow+e7slCgCfb5it
AkS/xnQHbvTdXkrSIhTpFu8=
=TqDH


Prev: [FT] PBEM Game - Sentient Strife Simulation Next: Re: Support the Origins Awards!