Prev: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance? Next: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

From: David Griffin <carbon_dragon@y...>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 06:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?


--- Roger Books <books@mail.state.fl.us> wrote:
...
> 
> I don't worry, until their ideas cause them to
> want to change to rule to fit the way they think
> it should be.  For example wanting all beam weapons
> to be able to fire at fighters or no beam weapons
> to be able to fire at fighters because it doesn't
> fit their reality.  It balances nicely now, that
> section doesn't need tweaking.

I was with you up to that last part. And it will
be up to GZG whether this sort of thing is possible
in FBIII (if and when it's published). I'm sure
it will be balanced either way.

I was under the impression that offering suggestions
for FBIII is one of the charters of this group. It
is a resource, is it not, for GZG to use as part of
their continuing evolution of the FT game.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 


Prev: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance? Next: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?