Re: 2nd CanAm

Certainly nothing wrong with that. If you wanted
to give them a little leeway, you could design
variants of your design that made slight differences
(more PDS, less PDS, Pulse vs. salvo missile,
whatever)
but there's no reason why you should.

Just do decent designs and playtest. I played a
scenario where the designs were so bad I was 
little better than a practice target for my 
opponent. Mainly it was just poor matching rather
than poor design (salvo missiles against a lot
of Kra'vak).

--- Chris DeBoe <LASERLIGHT@QUIXNET.NET> wrote:
> From: "David Griffin" <carbon_dragon@yahoo.com>
> > >
> > Well then the pretested, fixed ship scenario would
> appear to be an answer.
> <snip> Perhaps
> > you could ask the CANAM players to submit ships in
>  advance?
> 
> The players would not design them at all.  I would
> design IF ships and NI
> ships (the latter being based on Noam's published
> examples) and post them.
> If a player wants a CH. he'd be able to pick IF
> Heavy Cruiser A or B, or
> Israeli Cruiser Aleph or Beth, but no modifications
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35