Prev: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance? Next: Re: [FT] 2nd CanAm

RE: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:08:47 -0400
Subject: RE: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?

Or it could be another beam emitter connected to the beam source. The
initial 4 mass is 3 mass for the beam source and 1 for the beam emitter
(but
only shows as 1 icon as the whole system goes down if any part of it is
damaged).

For Class-2 Beams, the source is 1 mass and each emitter is .33 mass. 

For Class-1 Beams, the source is .4 mass and each emitter is .10 mass.

Phalon Pulsars are similar. They have a 1.5 mass source and each emitter
is
.5 mass.

!Notice: The above is pure PSB!

-----
Brian Bell
-----

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Gill [SMTP:rmgill@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:51 PM
> To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject:	Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance?
> 
> At 5:48 AM -0700 6/13/01, David Griffin wrote:
> >Doesn't that depend on what kind of mount you're
> >talking about? If you're dealing with something
> >that looks like it belongs on the Yamato, then
> >yes. But lasers and electronics aren't necessarily
> >heavy, so the weight might be negligible, or at
> >least pretty light. Also, some designs (like the
> >collimeter phaser on the dish of the 1701D)
> >don't require any motion of any kind and thus
> >could easily target anything in it's arc instantly.
> 
> David, how many mass is adding an arc to a class 3? 1 additional 
> mass. Sounds like the gear for shifting point of aim is quite heavy.
> 
> --
> - Ryan Montieth Gill		  DoD# 0780 (Smug #1) / AMA / SOHC -
> - ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com  I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
> - rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com	       www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/ -


Prev: Re: [FT] Should all Beams fire at fighters/ordinance? Next: Re: [FT] 2nd CanAm