RE: OT: Oceanography stuff
From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 12:37:40 +1000
Subject: RE: OT: Oceanography stuff
G'day David,
>From the back cover: "Seaworld. A
>guilt-ridden Earth had turned Cachalot
>over the few surviving cetaceans as a
>perpetual refuge - a planet whose
>surface was one great ocean, where
>the remnants of the whales, porpoises,
>and dolphins could pursue thier lives and
>perhaps even the development of an
>intelligence greater than man's. <more>"
Thanks.... though the thought of successful transport and setting up a
suitable supporting ecology seems like a truly Herculean task!!
>Not so much in that (though it's
>certainly an interesting idea), but the
>thought of Micro-Indo-Polynesian's
>seeking worlds that fit thier culture
>*and* that most other people don't want.
The question being that if they had the opportunity of a world of their
own
would they necessarily want one that's mostly water with little if an
arable land? I don't know just wondering.
Beyond that I personally think most planets will have a mix of climate
zones and that peoples from a nation with one kind of climate on Earth
may
not necessarily immediately head for that climate on planet X... then
again
maybe they will (??). It is a nice idea, just not sure if I agree with
it ;)
>The book is a great read BTW.
Cool, another one to add to the growing list!
Thanks
Beth