Prev: Re: More Club100 Ghurkas at Eureka Next: Does SG2 artificially limit casualties?

Re: [FT] WotW #7 Holofields

From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:58:09 +0100
Subject: Re: [FT] WotW #7 Holofields

In message <20010410174944.30750.qmail@web10404.mail.yahoo.com>
	  Shawn M Mininger <smininger@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I actually upped the mass to 10%.  This may be a bit
> high, but the holofield effectively makes it harder to
> be hit by ALL weapons (except plasma bolt which is
> area effect)
> 
> The logic behind this is that my group tends to use a
> lot of alternate weapon systems, not just beams.  When
> I started thinking about how many more weapons are
> covered by the holofield vs. screens, I realized that
> I needed to up the mass.  
> 
> I think 7% would be fair if you were primarily using
> ships right out of the books.  My group tends to
> custom build our own ships and fleets so we don't use
> nearly as many beam weapons (the pulse torp is a huge
> favorite in my group.)
> 
[snip]
> =====
> Thank You,
> 
> Shawn M Mininger
> 
OTOH, 10% is easier to calculate :-)

So, what does everybody else think? 7% or 10%, or....?

Prev: Re: More Club100 Ghurkas at Eureka Next: Does SG2 artificially limit casualties?