RE: [FT] (LONG) The Balance of Power -- Fighters and a Defense

Thanks. Unfortunately AFHAWKS only returns a few
hits and all are indirect references to a similar
system to the one I proposed.

Does anyone have the stats for it? I thought of
salvo missiles targetted to fighters, but their
motion is too unpredictable to just target at them
so I tried to do a variation on them.

--- "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)"
<Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil> wrote:
> I'm not Jerry, but the Mailing list archives are at
> http://www.warpfish.com/jhan/ft/Archive/
> 
> 
> -----
> Brian Bell
> bkb@beol.net
> http://www.ftsr.org/
> -----
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Oerjan Ohlson [SMTP:oerjan.ohlson@telia.com]
> > Sent:	Sunday, April 01, 2001 2:34 PM
> > To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> > Subject:	Re: [FT] (LONG) The Balance of Power --
> Fighters and a
> > Defense
> > 
> > [ka-snip]
> > 
> > David, it seems that you joined the mailing list
> one week too late. We
> > (well, others - for once I didn't have time to get
> involved) just had a
> > long discussion on anti-fighter missiles. 
> > 
> > It should be available in the mailing list
> archives by now (Jerry, the
> > URL please?); the title of the thread was "WotW #5
> AFHAWKS".
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Oerjan Ohlson
> > oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
> > 
> > "Life is like a sewer.
> > What you get out of it, depends on what you put
> into it."
> > - Hen3ry

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text