Prev: RE: [SG] Close Assault Questions Next: RE: [SG] Close Assault Questions

RE: [SG] Close Assault Questions

From: Nathan rolfe <nathan_rolfe@d...>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:38:32 +1000
Subject: RE: [SG] Close Assault Questions

At 07:17 AM 3/29/01 -0500, you wrote:
>As I stated before, I would prefer it to stop at d12:d4.
>
>I also like Tom Barclay/Los' ganging up rules used in "A Grey Day to
Die":
>
> From http://fox.nstn.ca/~kaladorn/Gaming/AGreyDayToDieForumPage.htm
>Close Assault - Numbers Do Count!
>Rationale: In SG2 close combat resolution, it is rather revolting to
see a
>Veteran defender engage 9 Green troops, roll a 7 (mediocre or
moderately
>good roll) and just tell them not to bother to roll any dice because
they're
>all dead. A modifier should fix this.
>Ratio		    Effect
>  1:1		     As Normal
>  2:1		     Outnumbered figure shifts down 1
>  3:1 (or greater)  Outnumbered figure shifts down 2
>
>If GW has droped the gang up rule from their games then it must be a
good 
>idea :) , I would have thought this was already configured into the
rules 
>it's been so long since we have palyed SG2.

Nathan rolfe
ICQ 105104771
Tasmania Australia
Web site
www.geocities.com/britcomedy

Prev: RE: [SG] Close Assault Questions Next: RE: [SG] Close Assault Questions