Re: WotW #5: AFHAWKS
From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 22:26:17 GMT
Subject: Re: WotW #5: AFHAWKS
In message
<6B3C0EEAB4FED3119F5F009027DC5E9E01D72F92@spacemsg3.jhuapl.edu>
"Izenberg, Noam" <Noam.Izenberg@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> I agree with Charles that we've basically put the railgun to bed.
>
> Let's do something a smidge diffferent this time and go for a
non-weapon
> system. I remember a request from before to look at the AFHAWKS.
>
> AF-SMLs (or AFHAWKS) [GZG-LISTers] (24-Dec-00)
> Mass/Cost= As normal SM round
> Effect:
> Vs. ships: None
> Vs. Fighters: as KV Scattergun
> Range=12 MU
> Intercepts fighters with short duration high accuracy drives and
> electronics. Light warhead is ineffective vs. ships, but kills
fighters
> effectively. Fired through SML launcher arcs only. Fires in PDS
phase, does
> not require firecon. Can fire as ADFC. Can only be used by a sml that
has
> not fired a anti-ship round that turn.
>
> Comments:
> (Noam) I think it should require a Firecon. The range is too great for
No
> firecon and ADFC benefits. Also, I feel that choice of AFHAWK should
be
> required during written orders phase and SML can't fire normal rounds
that
> turn.
A couple of points 1) I take it these can also be used against missiles
(SM or MT) - can they be used against Plasma Bolts?
2) Of course, the any ship using these must have had them loaded at the
start :-)
These work a lot like Sa'Va'Sku interceptor pods (range 12 mu, kills 1d6
fighters or missiles, reduces plasma bolts by 1 beam die without
re-rolls).
Has anyone tried using these?