Re: Re:[OT]Governments was: [FT] UNSC (emotional rant), etc etc etc...
From: Tony Christney <tchristney@h...>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:11:07 -0800
Subject: Re: Re:[OT]Governments was: [FT] UNSC (emotional rant), etc etc etc...
>--- KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de wrote:
>>
>> That may be nice as a daydream, but people living in
>> such places as
>> Somalia or Afghanistan will tell you it's not going
>> to happen. Either one
>> side will win or the fighting will go on forever,
>> with more bystanders
>> than warriors killed or some third party will pick
>> up the pieces, and that
>> third party will be even worse.
>>
>> If I have to choose between lawyers and gunslingers,
>> give me lawyers
>> any time.
>>
>> Greetings
>> Karl Heinz
>
>I could not agree more.
>
>Mike J.
I can. I agree more.
;)
This is so far off topic I think that it would be
wise to completely drop the thread, or move it to
another forum. When you see a thread's subject
prefaced with [OT] for a week, I think it is bordering
on, or has crossed into, abuse.
>=====
>Visit 20th Century/Future Wargame Resource page
>http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Rampart/1966/
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
>http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
--