RE: FMAS names
From: "Owen Glover" <oglover@b...>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 10:08:39 +1100
Subject: RE: FMAS names
Some other posibilities?
Crash Action - more submariner maybe?
Rules of Engagement - doesn't fit teh two word theme
Alpha Team - Vietnam connotations?
Full Auto
Immediate Action - too long
Special Action - too generic?
Strike Swiftly - too generic?
Assault Force - too generic?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Andy Cowell
> Sent: Saturday, 17 February 2001 6:36 AM
> To: Barclay, Tom
> Cc: Gzg Digest (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: FMAS names
>
>
> In message
> <417DEC289A05D4118408000102362E0A54CA05@host-253.bitheads.com>, "Bar
> clay, Tom" writes:
> >
> > 5: Body Count
> >
> > 6: In Harm's Way
>
> I like those.
>
> > 9: Rapid Fire!
>
> This is already taken, WW2 rules IIRC.
>
> > 12: Fireteam Zero! (works in the GZG theme and captures the
> small unit idea)
>
> Not bad either. Alternately, just Fireteam.
>
> Dirtside. Stargrunt. Fireteam. Not bad.
>