Re: General EMP Thoughts

How about defender (the person hit) shooses which weapons, electronics,
etc.
I say this because the amount of hardening each system is going to have
will
(in general) be in  proportion to its importance.  And, theoretically
anyway, the person hit will choose to lose the less important systems.
Makes sense?

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Beth Fulton" <beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: General EMP Thoughts

> G'day Schoon,
>
>  >1) They should affect a set number of systems
>  >2) They should have a clearly defined, simple list
>
> OK then for arguments sake say it was
> Weapons
> Electronics (FC etc)
> Criticals
>
> How would you deal with the case where there were 3 hits but 5
weapons?
And
> how do you stop people saying OK we do the 3 class 1s first then the
class
> 2s (sorry, but I'm in a pernickety mood today).
>
> Cheers
>
> Beth
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
> Elizabeth Fulton
> c/o CSIRO Division of Marine Research
> GPO Box 1538
> HOBART
> TASMANIA 7001
> AUSTRALIA
> Phone (03) 6232 5018 International +61 3 6232 5018
> Fax 03 6232 5053 International +61 3 6232 5053
>
> email: beth.fulton@marine.csiro.au
>
>