RE: [FT] Weapon of the Week - AM-SM
From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:45:37 GMT
Subject: RE: [FT] Weapon of the Week - AM-SM
In message <B18DDC5F1158D311A66900805FD47181C89D82@VSTASV1>
"Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:
> Looks sorted out to me.
>
> *Next Victim!*
>
> (I can't access the list from work, Charles, so if you can pick the
next
> one?)
>
> Neath Southern Skies -http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernskies/
> [MKW2] Admiral Peter Rollins - Task Force Zulu-Beta
> [Firestorm] Battletech PBeM GM
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charles Taylor [SMTP:charles.taylor@cableol.co.uk]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 5:26 AM
> >
> > Ok, so lets stick with MASS 3 per salvo for the moment, and assume
that
> > the fact that the missiles are _not_ activly homing in on one target
> > 'explains' the reduced PDS etc. performance against them :-)
> >
> > Ok, IMHO I think we've (mostly Brendan and Oerjan) sorted this one
:-)
> >
> > Charles
I think Noam beat me to it :-) - see the [FT]WotW 2: EMP Weapons.