Re: [FT] Weapon of the Week - AM-SM
From: "Oerjan Ohlson" <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:54:43 +0100
Subject: Re: [FT] Weapon of the Week - AM-SM
Charles Taylor wrote:
>Hmm.. one of the things I wasn't sure of was how many times a PBL >is
likely to be used per scenario - which would affect the comparison -
>thanks for providing the experience.
You're welcome.
>Ok, so lets stick with MASS 3 per salvo for the moment, and assume
>that the fact that the missiles are _not_ activly homing in on one
>target 'explains' the reduced PDS etc. performance against them :-)
That could work, yes. Brendan's phased explosion sounds interesting as
well.
>Ok, IMHO I think we've (mostly Brendan and Oerjan) sorted this one
>:-)
>So, can we use these as the 'one true' FT2.5 Narn Energy mine?
>
>Or do the Narns demand something more powerful with a longer >range?
Longer range isn't a problem if you allow the munitions to be bigger
:-)
Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."