Prev: RE: [SG2] Claymores discouraging close assaults? Next: RE: Glossary/Acronym List (was: SG2- Like it?)

RE: SG2- Like it?

From: "Casquilho, Daniel" <Daniel.Casquilho@d...>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:18:17 -0800
Subject: RE: SG2- Like it?

Hello All,

Geoffery wrote:
>If your not an out and out modern military specialist you 
>have virtually no hope of learning the rules by yourself. 
>The jargon can be absolutley brain numbing in that it assumes 
>that you know most things before you start reading.

I would have to disagree. I have never served in the military and I was
the
first in our group to buy the rules. It did take more then one reading
to
understand some of the rules but then it took me a while to understand
some
of the other war games I bought in the past.

Allan Goodall wrote:
>It took two readings of the rules, too: one before
>playing, one after...

I agree Allan, after we put some guys onto the table and played a couple
of
times issues became clear and the rules made more sense.

I do feel that Jon is very acronym heavy in his stuff, but as Beth wrote
"my
'machine gun guys'" seem to do their job just fine. I do wish that there
where less acronyms but then I just have a memory problem with them for
some
reason :-)

Prev: RE: [SG2] Claymores discouraging close assaults? Next: RE: Glossary/Acronym List (was: SG2- Like it?)