RE: [SG2] Claymores discouraging close assaults?
From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@d...>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:44:21 -0500
Subject: RE: [SG2] Claymores discouraging close assaults?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark.langsdorf@amd.com [SMTP:mark.langsdorf@amd.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 10:36 AM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: [SG2] Claymores discouraging close assaults?
>
[snip].
> Final question, related to the incident: Can an
> unactivated unit use reaction fire against a close assaulting
> unit that needs two combat moves to get to the target
> unit? My command squad was unactivated and had a good view
> of the action, and it seems to me they should have been able
> to fire upon the PA as it charged. Of course, this didn't
> occur to me until afterwards, and again, I don't know if the
> rules support this.
>
> -Mark Langsdorf
-----End Original Message-----
I had this question also. And if reaction fire (or overwatch fire if
using
those house rules) is allowed, what would be the result of
suppression/casualties on the assaulting force?
---
Brian Bell
bkb@beol.net