Favorite Campaign Format - A question?

Greetings,

I've looked through the archives, and stumbled around the webring
(lots's of neat pages there, BTW) and have the following question:

What success has anyone had in designing a quick(relatively) campaign
system, and could they part with some details, if yes?

Please feel free to drop me a line off list.
I'm working up mine own format, if any soul is so
interested, then I'll be happy to send out a copy.

Thanks in advance
Pat Connaughton
e-mail - ptconn@earthlink.net
homepage - www.home.earthlink.net/~ptconn
ICQ # 2535086
"He who knows not how to dissemble knows not
how to reign"
Tiberius, Emperator and Princips of Rome

----- Original Message -----
From: Robert W. Hofrichter <RobHofrich@peoplepc.com>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [SG][DS][FT] Jumna Class Patrol Cruiser and Naval Infantry
Company

> I did a much lighter version of this kind of vessel for my Dutch--it
is
> classed as a Colonial Cruiser.  Designed for independant
operations--and
> carrying a Royal Dutch Marine Company.  And yes, it is streamlined,
too.
>
> Firepower on par with a small destroyer, slightly better defenses than
most
> DD, but still capable of carrying the troops.  It carried NO interface
> assault landers--that's why the vessel was streamlined.
>
> I can't say it was a very efficient design.  It was designed for
police
> operations and show-the-flag kind of missions.  And it did let you
move
some
> troops in a manner that was better protected and faster than most
light
> transports...
>
> Rob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Downes-Ward" <c.downes-ward@iname.com>
> To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 12:43 PM
> Subject: [SG][DS][FT] Jumna Class Patrol Cruiser and Naval Infantry
Company
>
>
> > Here's something I've been knocking up in my spare time. Brickbats
welcome
> > but the TOE of the infantry company is based around the models I
have
> which
> > explains some of the equipment. The idea was based around having a
single
> > ship which had plenty of different options for the kind of scenarios
it
> > could get involved in. The ship it self in FT scenarios, the entire
> company
> > in Dirtside sceanrios either on its own or coopertating with other
forces
> > and the spearhead platoon and power armour recon units in Stargunt.
> >
> > The Jumna Class Patrol Cruiser.
> >
> > The Jumna class is best appreciated by considering it's role first
and
in
> > particular what it is not. it is NOT a line of battle vessel despite
being
> > built on a hull the same size as many Battle Cruisers. It is
intended
for
> > independent show the flag and colonial policing and piracy
suppression
> > operations in areas where it is not likely to meet "main force"
> opposition.
> >
> > Jumna
> > Class=Battlecruiser (BC)
> > TMF=102
> > NPV=328
> > FTL=Standard
> > MD=4
> > Armour=2
> > HullIntegrity=Average - 30%
> > HullPoints=31
> > HullTrack=8,8,8,7
> > StreamLining=Partial
> > CrewFactor=6
> > CrewLine1=1,5
> > CrewLine2=1,3
> > CrewLine3=2,1,7
> > CrewLine4=2,5,6
> > FCS=2
> > FighterBays=1
> > PDSs=1
> > Sensors=Standard
> > CargoSpace=1
> > PassengerSpace=2
> > Hangars=1x Size2 - carries 2 size 1 Tactical Interface Transports
> > Weapons
> > Class 3 Battery=F, FP, FS
> > Class 2 Battery=F, FP, FS
> > Ortillery System
> >
> > The Jumna also has drop tubes for 6 power armour troopers.
> >
> > The Jumna embarks a complete Naval infantry company organised as
follows
> > (Dirtside):
> > HQ
> > 1 HQ team and a jeep
> > 1 FO team and a jeep
> > 1 PA (recon) squad of 2 x 3 man PA teams
> > 1st (light mechanised) "spearhead" platoon
> > 3 x light mechanised squads of 1 M38 LIPPC
> > 1 x 1M44 LIPFSV
> > 2nd and 3rd (light) Platoons
> > 1 HQ Squad of 1 rifle team + 1 APSW team
> > 3 Rifle squads of 1 rifle team + 1 APSW team
> > 1 x 1M44 LIPFSV
> >
> > This unit is intended to act as stiffening to local militia forces.
The
> > three M44's could be organised as a light armoured platoon to add
some
> > "punch". Normal deployment would be for the PA to orbitally insert
and
be
> > followed up by the transports carrying either the one of the light
> platoons,
> > the FO team and the HQ team or carrying two M38's and their
passengers.
Of
> > course if the whole company can ride down in adminstrative shuttles
to a
> > nice comfy starport and then borrow some trucks so much the better.
> >
> > In stargrunt terms the "Spearhead" and recon PA are rated as follows
> >
> > Recon Squad
> > Identical to the Power-Armoured Infantry Squad on P69 of Stargrunt
II
> >
> > "spearhead" platoon
> > 3 M38 LIPPC's, 1 M44 LIPFSV
> > 1st and 2nd Squads
> > 1 squad leader and 2 riflemen with KI-72
> > 1 SAW gunner with RK-80
> > 3rd Squad
> > 1 squad leader and 2 riflemen with KI-72
> > 1 GMS/P gunner with AT-17 "sandbox"
> >
> > See P69 of Stargrunt II for weapon stats.
> >
> > M38 Light Interface Portable Personnel Carrier (LIPPC)
> > Size 2
> > Armour 2/1
> > CFE Engine
> > Mobility = High Mobility Wheeled (10)
> > RFAC/1 in Turret (Enhanced Firecon)
> > GMS/L in Turret (Enhanced Firecon)
> > Amphibious
> > 1 Infantry team
> > 73 Points
> >
> > M44 Light Interface Portable Fire Support Vehicle (LIPFSV)
> > Size 2
> > Armour 2/1
> > CFE Engine
> > Mobility = High Mobility Wheeled (10)
> > RFAC/2 in Turret (Enhanced Firecon)
> > RFAC/1 in Turret (Enhanced Firecon)
> > GMS/L in Turret (Enhanced Firecon)
> > 77 Points
> >
> > Known Problems:
> >
> > There are only two Assault shuttles, each capable of carrying one
size 2
> > vehicle + passengers OR 16 troops. This means that it takes two
waves to
> > land an entire platoon with its vehicles.
> >
> > In order to give tactical transport to the two light platoons they
have
to
> > scrounge vehicles locally.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>